Synergistic Development of Technological Innovation in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area: Realistic Constraints and Optimization Paths

Authors

  • GAO Xiaoyu Author
  • LU Quanzhi Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.65196/kjng9k31

Keywords:

Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area, Technological Innovation, Collaborative Innovation, Institutional Differences, Optimization Pathways

Abstract

The synergistic development of technological innovation in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area serves as a crucial lever for the national strategy to advance regional innovation layouts. It aims to create an international technology and innovation hub with global influence by integrating the innovative resources of Guangdong, Hong Kong, and Macao. In recent years, the Greater Bay Area has made significant progress in collaborative innovation, primarily reflected in increased R&D investment, enhanced capacity for joint research on key technologies, and increasingly abundant innovation resources. However, regional collaborative innovation still faces numerous challenges. These mainly include: poor coordination of rules due to institutional differences; uneven distribution of innovation resources; restrictions on the cross-border flow of research funding and talent; inadequate mechanisms for intellectual property protection and commercialization; and a regional dynamic where internal competition often outweighs cooperation. Based on this analysis, it is necessary to further promote the alignment of institutional mechanisms, deepen reforms in the market-based allocation of production factors, and construct a cross-regional innovation community. These measures are essential to break through the current bottlenecks and unleash the full potential of the Greater Bay Area's innovation system.

Published

2026-03-31

Issue

Section

文章

How to Cite

Synergistic Development of Technological Innovation in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area: Realistic Constraints and Optimization Paths. (2026). Journal of Science and Technology Exploration, 2(3), 35 – 40. https://doi.org/10.65196/kjng9k31